It is just to acknowledge a possible contact and reference between Moses and the Kenites in Midian. Rowley argues, this hypothesis does not mean that Moses simply ‘mediated’ the religion of the Kenites to the Israelites. This is to recognize the force of the ‘Kenite hypothesis’. Nicholson, Exodus and Sinai in History and Tradition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1973) p.69 F Payne, ‘Old Testament Exegesis and the problem of ambiguity’, in The Annual of the Swedish Theological Institute in Jerusalem, vol. Lindars (London: Cambridge University Press 1968) pp.1–14.Ĭf. Ackroyd, ‘Meaning and Exegesis’ in Words and Meanings, edited by P. Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament (London: Oxford University Press 1968) pp.1–13.Ĭf. Further articles on the same theme are found in The Jewish Quarterly Review, 1946, pp.177–8 and in Journal of Jewish Studies, 1955, pp.50–2.Ĭf. Further articles in the same journal appear in 1935, pp. The initial discussion is in ‘The Root yada’ in Hebrew’ in The Journal of Theological Studies, 1934, pp.298–306.
![theological wordbook of the old testament pdf download theological wordbook of the old testament pdf download](http://ebook3000.com/upimg/allimg/180215/1421530.jpg)
These studies by Winton Thomas cover a number of years of work.
![theological wordbook of the old testament pdf download theological wordbook of the old testament pdf download](http://images.amazon.com/images/P/9004096981.jpg)
Bultmann, ginōskō in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by G. Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (London: Oxford University Press 1952).Ĭf.